Skip to main content
Submitted by moiuser on 27 June 2021

Chairman of the State Administration Council Commander-in-Chief of Defence Services Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, currently in the Russian Federation, answers the questions raised by Mr Fedor Lukyanov, anchorperson of the International Review programme of Russia 24 at an interview. The following is the interview.

Q: The international community is criticizing the current government of Myanmar for violating  human  rights  and  violently  cracking  down  on  the  public  protesters.  How  will you act to overcome the political crisis in your country?  Do  you  have  any  plan  to  hold  elections  again  in  line with democratic norms to bring back a civilian government? 

A: It is right. Such difficulties unexpectedly  emerged  when  efforts  are  being  made  to  develop democracy in Myanmar. As  we  responded  to  violent  acts  in  taking  action  against  such measures, we faced various  blames  due  to  misunderstanding  over  us.  I’d  like  to  say  protests  are  generally  staged  against  a  government  in  a  democracy.  Such  event  may happen in every country. There  are  many  examples  of  similar  events.  But,  if  ordinary  protests  may  be  transformed  into  terror  acts  and  attacks,  relevant  responsible  security  organization  needs  to  respond  to  such  acts  not  to harm the people as well as not  to  undermine  the  rule  of  law.  If  their  acts  are  beyond  the  restrictions,  we  need  to  take action against them under the law. Whoever commits the acts  beyond  the  restrictions,  we  will  take  action  under  the  law. So, we don’t have any refusal  over  the  event.  In  fact,  such an event is based on malpractices in the elections performed in a practice of democracy.  Although  such  an  event  could  be  cleared  in  the  early  stage,  the  problem  happened  due to the absence of holding the  dialogues  to  address  the  malpractices. I have declared the fivepoint road map as our future plans since we took the office. If the state of emergency and appropriate processes would have been completed, I have given a promise to hold an election  democratically  with out fail. But, the country needs to be peaceful and stable. The situation  must  have  completion of necessary preparations for the forthcoming election. If so, I’d like to say the election will be held without fail.

Q: Do you find it difficult to give an exact deadline for the election now?

A: It depends on the peace and stability  of  the  current  situation.  Our  constitution  stipulates a declaration of the state of  emergency  for  one  year.If  the  work  process  is  not  accomplished,  I  must  report  to  the  responsible  organization  to extend the six-month term two times. It may be one year or two years. Roughly, I’d like to  say  the  election  would  be  held  within  two  years.  I  can  reply so. Now, our country does not reach cent per cent peace and  stability.  So,  we  need  to  consider it. Now, it is too early to say it but the election may be held within two years.

Q:  We  have  learnt  that  the  whole world takes interest in Myanmar as it serves as both a militarily and economically strategic location for South-east  Asia  and  South  Asia.  Looking  at  Yangon,  how  do  you act to ensure peace and stability there? Who is main-ly responsible for this? What connections do you have with them?

A: It depends on the outlook of the western bloc. Our country is  located  in  a  strategic  position  of  geographical  conditions  in  Southeast  Asia.  Our  country sharing a border with the  Indian  Ocean  and  Bay  of  Bengal  is  close  to  powerful  China and India. They are interested  in  the  geographical  condition of our country.  They are  interested  in  our  country  on the political ground. In the post-independence period, Myanmar  exercised  parliamentary democracy at first. When the Revolutionary Council has emerged, the country marched forward  in  the  socialist  programme. At that time, the peo-ple  aspired  to  the  multiparty  system.  In  1988,  the  unrests  happened  and  then,  the  government  fell  in  1988.  Then,  the  Tatmadaw  maintained  the country under control. So, we walk along the path of de-mocracy  the  people  aspired.  In 2011, we march onward the way  of  democracy.  They  are  interested in the politics of democracy,  geographical  condition of the country and political ground. So, I review that generally,  the  western  countries wish to interfere in the internal affairs of our country.

Q: Under current global political  circumstances,  power rivalry and confrontation between  China  and  the  US  are intensifying significantly. These two powerful countries  want  Asian  countries  to  cooperate  so  that  they  can  be  under  the  influence  of  the  countries  they  like.  Asian  countries  themselves  are found to be cooperating with the countries they have good  diplomatic  relations  with.  What  is  your  opinion  about this political setting? 

A:  Our  country  is  a  member  of ASEAN. For the first point, we are a member state of the United  Nations.  We  regained  independence in 1948. We have experiences of the colonial era. I have already said Myanmar sharing  a  border  with  India  and  China.  According  to  our  country’s history and geopolitics we passed, we exercised the non-aligned foreign policy. Later,  we  practised  the  independent and active foreign policy and then friendly relations policy  with  all  countries  and  the  policy  based  on  the  five  principles  of  peaceful  coexistence.    So,  Myanmar  has  friendship  countries  only  but  enemy ones. As you refer, the USA is also Myanmar’s friend but it is in some far distance. But,  our  neighbouring  China  and India are our close friends. Whatever it may be, we must emphasize  the  neighbouring  relations. Any country cannot deny it. The neighbouring relations must not be improper. We have mutual cooperation with them.  We  also  do  cooperate  with other countries. We have relations with the USA but both countries are in some distance due  to  various  reasons.  The  politics with them is also cool due to the far distance. Hence, they  are  slightly  strange  in  comparison  with  our  neighbouring countries. But we decided to join hands with all the countries amicably. Moreover, being a member of ASEAN, we do the process in line with the practices of ASEAN.

Q:  We  say  the  US  is  a  distant friend and China a close friend. How about Russia?

A:  Russia  is  very  friendly  among  the  friend  countries.  You  ask  me  for  the  United  States  only,  so  I  referred  to  China and the USA. Russia is our  old  and  good  friend.  Despite being the far distance in the political ground, the souls of both countries are so close. Both  countries  are  in  a  far  distance but minds are close. Both countries have common historical  conditions.  We  are  similar  in  struggling.  So,  I’d  like to metaphorize Russia as our perpetual friend.

Q: Since the mid-19th century before the official establishment of the Russia-Myanmar friendship,  Russian  diplomatic  delegations  visited  Myanmar which also sent its delegations. During that period, both countries have understood each other. As you said,  we  are  really  intimate  friends. Meanwhile, bilateral cooperation  has  improved.  Are  you  satisfied  with  such  progress and success? While seeking  full  cooperation,  there  can  be  processes  yet  to be implemented. When it comes  to  Russia-Myanmar  cooperation, how much pro-cess can there be to be carried out? I would like to know what you will do about this.

A: Russian-Myanmar relations have  been  good  throughout  history. In the 1990s, relations were better, especially in military-technological cooperation. It is very encouraging. Myanmar is a developing country. At a  time  when  we  are  trying  to  develop our country, we need abundant  human  resources.  A  lot  of  our  citizens  have  been  sent  to  Russia  for  their  studies. There are over 7,000. Many  outstanding  persons  have  emerged  from  training  here.  They  are  participating  extensively in nation-building tasks.  When  it  comes  to  the  collaboration sector, the mili tary-technological cooperation that I have said is the deepest. There are also joint ventures. Yet, what we need to do more is bilateral contacts, trade, global tourism, culture and cooperation  in  sports,  education  and  health. Russia has a very high health  standard.  I  see  those  fields as very wide. I intend to do  everything  I  can  do  with-in my capacity. I think we will have a better future.  

Q:  Among  the  sectors  you  talked about, I have come to review  that  tourism  is  such  a promising sector. At a time when  Russia  has  stopped  tourism activities due to the COVID-19  pandemic,  there  are  a  lot  of  Russian  people  willing  to  travel.  If  Russia  has the chance when the preventive  measures  go  well,  Russian people will come to Myanmar  by  grabbing  that  chance.  Thank  you  for  answering my questions.

A:  Well.  If  we  have  a  lot  of  contacts,  we  will  have  more  intimacy  and  trust.  This  is  why more cooperation is necessary  for  various  sectors  to  have  more  contacts  between  the two peoples. Then, we will have greater trust and better friendship. Humans are building  up  things  with  trust  and  confidence.  I  expect  Russian  investment in Myanmar. I also hope for a situation where international tourists can come to our country as early as possible. Anyhow, I will do my best.